UnitedHealthcare (Commercial) · dorsal root ganglion stimulation
v1verified 2026-07-24needs re-verificationmanual-pull source
✓ conditional · commercial
Delegated gates: trial, psych_eval, conservative_care -> InterQual CP: SCS Insertion (gated). The cell does not state numbers for delegated gates — confirm the operative criteria with UM/billing.
Criteria checklist
0 of 6 tickedIndications
- enumerated: yes
- covered:
- name: CRPS I and CRPS II (only)
- investigational:
- DRG stimulation for any condition other than CRPS I/II
Conservative care
- required: not stated in the policy
- min duration months: not stated in the policy
- note: delegated to InterQual
Trial
- required: not stated in the policy
- min duration days: not stated in the policy
- success criteria: not stated in the policy
- threshold is binding: not stated in the policy
- note: delegated to InterQual
Psychological evaluation
- required: not stated in the policy
- must clear: not stated in the policy
- note posture: delegated to InterQual
Quantity limits
- applies: no
Device / waveformagnostic
Payor-specific notes
UHC's SCS policy (2026T0567DD) lists DRG stimulation as proven for CRPS I/II ONLY (non-CRPS DRG is unproven), and delegates the granular gates (trial/psych/conservative) to InterQual — see uhc-commercial-scs.md. Those fields are null with a delegation note; pull InterQual to complete.
Ticks are a documentation aid — nothing is stored; they reset on reload.
Dot phrase
Lean narrative A&P attestation. `***` = fill-in. UHC's public policy fixes the DRG indication (CRPS I/II only); the operative trial/psych/conservative gates are InterQual (gated) — this phrase intentionally states no numeric gates.
.DRGUHC
.DRGUHC Assessment: *** — CRPS type *** (I or II only), chronic pain involving the ___ region, present *** and refractory to treatment. DRG stimulation is proven for CRPS I/II and unproven for any other indication. Medical necessity per UHC 2026T0567DD (Implanted Electrical Stimulator for the Spinal Cord, which covers DRG): the covered indication above is documented, and history, imaging, and prior-treatment records are on file. Conservative measures — pharmacologic therapy, physical therapy, and interventional treatment as appropriate — have been tried with unsatisfactory response: *** . UHC's published policy sets no conservative-care duration floor, no trial-response threshold, and no psychological-evaluation posture; those gates are adjudicated under InterQual (CP: Procedures, Spinal Cord Stimulator Insertion). Plan: Percutaneous DRG stimulation trial. Trial response and functional status will be assessed and documented to support permanent implantation under the InterQual SCS Insertion criteria. Risks, benefits, and alternatives discussed; consent obtained.
Where this payor diverges from the Medicare baseline
Cautions
Prior-auth pathway
- required: yes
- pathway: UHC PA; medical necessity per InterQual SCS Insertion
Provenance
- authority:
- type: commercial_policy
- id: UHC 2026T0567DD
- title: Implanted Electrical Stimulator for the Spinal Cord (covers DRG)
- applies because: UHC's SCS policy enumerates DRG; granular gates delegated to InterQual
- source: https://www.uhcprovider.com/content/dam/provider/docs/public/policies/comm-medical-drug/implanted-electrical-stimulator-spinal-cord.pdf
- archived copy:
sources/uhc_scs_2026-01-01.pdf(sha256 f3807fe648ea… — kept in the content repo, not served here) - effective: 2026-01-01 · payor last reviewed: 2026-01-01 · we verified: 2026-07-24 · v1
Change history
- 2026-07-24commercial cells: re-verify 27 source PDFs by SHA-256 (Carelon/eviCore/UHC/Cigna) - all unchanged vs committed archive; last_verified -> 2026-07-24
3615c231f0 - 2026-06-30Archive commercial source PDFs into sources/ + wire source_file/source_hash
c5466694c8 - 2026-06-28Add commercial DRG cells: Anthem, UHC, Cigna (from SCS-guideline data)
829db7c6dd